Saturday, September 12, 2026

Love and Devotion

Love and Devotion

بِسْمِ ٱللَّهِ ٱلرَّحْمَٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ

Bismi llāhi r-raḥmāni r-raḥīm

Surah al-Fātiḥah 1:1

Love

شاد باش ای عشقِ خوش‌سودایِ ما ای طبیبِ جمله علّت‌هایِ ما

Shād bāsh ey ʿeshq-e khosh-sowdā-ye mā Ey tabīb-e jomle ʿellat-hā-ye mā

Hail, Love, the harbinger of happiness— the physician of all our ills.

جسمِ خاک از عشق بر افلاک شد کوه در رقص آمد و چالاک شد

Jesm-e khāk az ʿeshq bar aflāk shod Kūh dar raqs āmad o chālāk shod

Our earthly body is elevated to the skies through Love; it makes the mountains come alive and dance.

The above couplets are from Ney Naama (Song of the Reed Flute), by Maulana Rumi.

عقل آمد دین و دنیا شد خراب عشق آمد در دو عالم کامیاب

ʿAql āmad dīn o donyā shod kharāb ʿEshq āmad dar do ʿālam kāmyāb

Logic ruins this world and the Hereafter; and with the arrival of Love, both worlds are achieved.

Devotion

زندگی آمد برایِ بندگی زندگی بی بندگی شرمندگی

Zendegī āmad barā-ye bandegī Zendegī bī bandegī sharmandegī

Life is only for devotion. Life without devotion is a disgrace.

Gathering, Separation, and the Beloved

Gathering, Separation, and the Beloved

بِسْمِ اللّٰهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ

Bismi llāhi r-raḥmāni r-raḥīm.

In the name of Allah, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful.

Surah al-Fātiḥah 1:1

Gathering and Separation

This quatrain, transmitted in early Sufi literature, is attributed in some sources to al-Junayd and in others to al-Ḥallāj:

وَتَحَقَّقْتُكَ فِي سِرِّي فَنَاجَاكَ لِسَانِي فَاجْتَمَعْنَا لِمَعَانِي وَافْتَرَقْنَا لِمَعَانِي إِنْ يَكُنْ غَيَّبَكَ التَّعْظِيمُ عَنْ لَحْظِ عِيَانِي فَقَدْ صَيَّرَكَ الْوَجْدُ مِنَ الْأَحْشَاءِ دَانِي

Wa-taḥaqqaqtuka fī sirrī fa-nājāka lisānī. Fa-jtamaʿnā li-maʿānī wa-ftaraqnā li-maʿānī. ʾIn yakun ghayyabaka t-taʿẓīmu ʿan laḥẓi ʿiyānī. Fa-qad ṣayyaraka l-wajdu mina l-aḥshāʾi dānī.

I found your reality in my innermost secret, and my tongue whispered to you in intimate confidence. So we came together for certain meanings, and we separated for certain meanings. If reverence has kept you hidden from the glance of my outward, visible sight, still longing—ecstatic love—has drawn you near from the very depths within me.

Attribution and Transmission

Al-Khaṭīb’s Tārīkh Baghdād records al-Ḥallāj reciting the poem as his own, while al-Qushayrī attributes it to al-Junayd. This difference in attribution remains part of the received tradition.

  1. لِلْجُنَيْدِ رَحِمَهُ اللّٰهُ

    Li-l-Junaydi, raḥimahu llāh.

    Al-Qushayrī’s al-Risāla al-Qushayriyya introduces the poem explicitly as “recited for al-Junayd” in its discussion of al-jamʿ wa-l-farq, or “gathering and separation.”

  2. وَلَهُ أَيْضًا …

    Wa-lahu ʾayḍan …

    Ibn Kathīr’s al-Bidāya wa-l-Nihāya includes these lines among al-Ḥallāj’s poetry in his biography under the year 309 AH.

  3. أَنْشَدَنِي … لِنَفْسِهِ بِالْبَصْرَةِ

    ʾAnshadanī … li-nafsihi bi-l-Baṣrah.

    Al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī’s Tārīkh Baghdād transmits an explicit report that al-Ḥusayn b. Manṣūr al-Ḥallāj recited the poem “for himself” in Basra: a direct attribution within a biographical isnād.

  4. كَمَا قَالَ بَعْضُهُمْ

    Kamā qāla baʿḍuhum.

    Al-Sulamī’s Ḥaqāʾiq al-Tafsīr quotes the verses anonymously under Qur’an 56:85, without naming an author.

I Do Not Know Where I Have Gone

In the words of Bū ʿAlī Shāh Qalandar Pānīpatī (R.A.):

منم محوِ خیالِ او نمی‌دانم کجا رفتم شدم غرقِ وصالِ او نمی‌دانم کجا رفتم

Manam mahv-e khayāl-e ū, nemī-dānam kojā raftam. Shodam gharq-e vesāl-e ū, nemī-dānam kojā raftam.

I am lost in my beloved’s thought—I do not know where I have gone. I am drowned in the ecstasy of union—I do not know where I have gone.

غلامِ رویِ او بودم اسیرِ مویِ او بودم غبارِ کویِ او بودم نمی‌دانم کجا رفتم

Gholām-e rū-ye ū būdam, asīr-e mū-ye ū būdam. Ghobār-e kū-ye ū būdam, nemī-dānam kojā raftam.

I was the servant of that radiant face, the captive of those tresses; I was the dust of that lane—I do not know where I have gone.

به عام آشنا گشتم زِ جان و دل فدا گشتم فنا گشتم فنا گشتم نمی‌دانم کجا رفتم

Be ʿām āshnā gashtam, ze jān o del fedā gashtam. Fanā gashtam, fanā gashtam, nemī-dānam kojā raftam.

Known everywhere among people, I offered up my heart and soul; I became annihilated—annihilated—I do not know where I have gone.

قلندر بو علی هستم به نامِ دوست سرمستم دل اندر عشقِ او بستم نمی‌دانم کجا رفتم

Qalandar Bū ʿAlī hastam, be nām-e dūst sarmastam. Del andar ʿeshq-e ū bastam, nemī-dānam kojā raftam.

I am Bu ʿAlī the qalandar; by the Friend’s name I am intoxicated; My heart is bound in His love—I do not know where I have gone.

Shaykh Sharaf al-Dīn Bū ʿAlī Shāh Qalandar Pānīpatī

شیخ شرفُ الدّین بو علی شاہ قلندر پانی پتی

Shaikh Sharaf ud-Dīn Bū ʿAlī Shāh Qalandar Pānīpatī.

In Search of a Glimpse

In Search of a Glimpse

بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ الرَّحِيمِ

Bismi llāhi r-raḥmāni r-raḥīm.

In the name of Allah, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful.

Sūrah al-Fātiḥah 1:1

This short poem is often attributed to Mawlānā Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad Rūmī (Persian: جلال‌الدین محمّد رومی). Its provenance, however, remains uncertain.

Rūmī (September 30, 1207–December 17, 1273) was a 13th-century poet, jurist, theologian, and Sufi mystic. He is widely known as Mevlānā (مولانا) and, in the West, as Rumi (رومی).

The Poem

نه من بیهوده گِردِ کوچه و بازار می‌گردم

Na man bīhūde gerd-e kūche o bāzār mī-gardam

I do not wander in vain through alley and bazaar—I roam.

مذاقِ عاشقی دارم پِیِ دیدار می‌گردم

Mazāq-e ʿāsheqī dāram, pey-e dīdār mī-gardam

I carry the taste of love; in search of a glimpse, I roam.

خدایا رَحم کن بر من پریشان‌وار می‌گردم

Khodāyā, rahm kon bar man—parīshān-vār mī-gardam

O God, have mercy on me—distraught and scattered, I roam.

خَطاکارم گناهکارم به حالِ زار می‌گردم

Khatākāram, gonāhkāram; be hāl-e zār mī-gardam

I am at fault, I am sinful; in this wretched state, I roam.

شرابِ شوق می‌نوشم به گِردِ یار می‌گردم

Sharāb-e showq mī-nūsham; be gerd-e yār mī-gardam

I drink the wine of longing; around the Friend, I roam.

سُخَن مستانه می‌گویم ولی هُوشیار می‌گردم

Sokhan mastāne mī-gūyam, valī hūshyār mī-gardam

I speak with drunken rapture, yet clear‑minded, I roam.

گهی خَندم گهی گِریَم گهی اُفتم گهی خیزم

Gahī khandam, gahī geryam; gahī oftam, gahī khīzam

At times I laugh, at times I weep; at times I fall, at times I rise.

مسیحا در دلم پیدا و من بیمار می‌گردم

Masīhā dar delam peydā, o man bīmār mī-gardam

The Messiah appears within my heart—and still, like the sick, I roam.

بیا جانا عِنایت کن تو مولانایِ رومی را

Biyā jānā, ʿenāyat kon to Mowlānā-ye Rūmī rā

Come, beloved—show your grace to Maulana Rumi.

غُلامِ شمسِ تبریزم قلندروار می‌گردم

Gholām-e Shams-e Tabrīzam; qalandar-vār mī-gardam

I am a servant of Shams of Tabriz; like a qalandar (a wandering dervish), I roam.

A Reflection on Ghurbat

In my view, the poem seems to echo a well-known description of taṣawwuf attributed to Junayd al-Baghdādī (may Allah be pleased with him). In this description, the path is summed up through prophetic qualities. Among them is the ghurbat—the condition of being a “stranger,” an exile—associated with Prophet Yaḥyā (peace and blessings be upon him).

Friday, September 11, 2026

There Is No God but He

There Is No God but He

A devotional poem attributed to Rumi by Sufinama; historical authorship has not yet been established.

The Lord of All Dominion

مَالِكُ الْمُلْكِ لَا شَرِيكَ لَهُ
وَحْدَهُ لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Māliku l-mulki lā sharīka lahu Waḥdahu lā ilāha illā huwa
He is the Lord of all dominion; He has no partner. He alone—there is no god but He.

I read the opening as a statement about God, giving مَالِكُ—māliku—the nominative ending. Mulk means dominion, sovereignty, or kingship; waḥdahu emphasizes His absolute uniqueness. The divine title occurs in Qurʾān 3:26, while the refrain appears in Qurʾān 2:255.

An Offering of Heart and Soul

عاشقان جان و دل نثار کنند
بر سرِ لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
ʿĀsheqān jān va del nesār konand Bar sar-e lā ilāha illā huwa
Lovers offer their hearts and souls in homage to “There is no god but He.”

جان و دل (jān va del) means “soul and heart,” expressing the whole inward self. نثار کردن (nesār kardan) evokes scattering precious gifts or making a generous offering. Here, the lovers offer themselves in devotion to the truth proclaimed by the refrain. “In homage to” conveys my reading of the figurative بر سرِ (bar sar-e).

The Robe of Honor

مصطفی یافت در شبِ معراج
خِلعتِ لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Mostafā yāft dar shab-e meʿrāj Khelʿat-e lā ilāha illā huwa
On the night of his Ascension, the Chosen One received the robe of honor: “There is no god but He.”

Muṣṭafā, “the Chosen One,” refers to the Prophet Muḥammad. A khilʿat is a robe bestowed as a mark of honor; here, it becomes a poetic image of divine favor and nearness. The linking vowel in خِلعتِ (khelʿat-e) makes the declaration itself the figurative robe. Dehkhodā’s entry for خلعت (khelʿat) records both its ceremonial and figurative senses.

The Eternal Gardener

باغبانِ قدیمِ لم‌یزلی
صِفَتَش لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Bāghbān-e qadīm-e lam-yazalī Sefatash lā ilāha illā huwa
The Gardener, beginningless and everlasting, is described by these words: “There is no god but He.”

I understand the singular Gardener as an image of God, who brings creation into being and sustains it. قدیم (qadīm) here means “without beginning”; لم‌یزلی (lam-yazalī) reinforces His everlasting existence. صفتش (sefatash) means “His attribute” or “His description.” Dehkhodā defines لم‌یزلی (lam-yazalī) as perpetual or everlasting.

The Tree and Its Fruit

خوش درختی است در میانِ جِنان
میوه‌اش لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Khosh derakhtī ast dar miyān-e jenān Mīve-ash lā ilāha illā huwa
A lovely tree stands amid the gardens of Paradise; its fruit is “There is no god but He.”

جِنان—jinān, pronounced jenān in modern Persian—means “gardens,” understood here as the gardens of Paradise. The image presents the declaration of God’s oneness as something nourishing and delightful: a truth whose sweetness can be experienced.

Remembrance and Paradise

صوفیان گر بهشت می‌طلبند
ذکرشان لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Sūfiyān gar behesht mī-talaband Zekreshān lā ilāha illā huwa
If the Sufis seek Paradise, their remembrance is “There is no god but He.”

ذکرشان (zekreshān) means “their remembrance” or “their devotional invocation.” The couplet associates the longing for Paradise with remembering God through the declaration of His oneness. It describes their practice while also encouraging the listener.

The Believers’ Portion

مؤمنان را نعیم شد روزی
بَرَکَتَش لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Moʾmenān rā naʿīm shod rūzī Barakatash lā ilāha illā huwa
Bliss has become the believers’ allotted share; its blessing is “There is no god but He.”

I read روزی (rūzī) here as “allotted provision” or “one’s portion,” a meaning documented in Dehkhodā. نعیم (naʿīm) means bliss or delightful well-being, with Paradise suggested by the preceding couplets. The second line is compressed: برکتش (barakatash) literally means “its blessing,” most naturally referring back to that bliss.

Seeking God

شمسِ تبریز اگر خدا طلبی
خوش بخوان لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Shams-e Tabrīz, agar Khodā talabī Khosh bekhān lā ilāha illā huwa
O Shams of Tabriz, if you seek God, chant beautifully: “There is no god but He.”

The closing turns to direct address. خدا طلبی (Khodā talabī) means “you seek God,” and خوش بخوان (khosh bekhān) means “recite or sing beautifully.” In a traditional recitation, the closing is approximately:

Shams-i Tabrīz, agar Khudā ṭalabī, Khush bikhwān: lā ilāha illā Hū.

A Variant Found in Munājāt Books in Kashmir

The following is a longer variant of this poem found in munājāt books in Kashmir—collections of devotional supplications and poems. The photographed page is headed مناجات and attributes the poem to Ḥaẓrat Mawlānā Shams al-Dīn Tabrīzī. This printed attribution is retained here as part of the variant’s transmission; it does not by itself establish historical authorship.

Its seventeen couplets preserve the refrain “There is no god but He,” with changes in wording and sequence and additional verses on creation, the four caliphs, and the Prophet’s knowledge of the declaration. The original text is followed by transliteration, translation, and a brief explanation, as in the version above.

Text: transcribed from the photographed munājāt page. Spelling, spacing, punctuation, and Arabic vowel marks have been normalized for reading. The small honorific marks beside Ṣiddīq and Fārūq are outside the metrical text; they convey the prayer “may God be pleased with him.” The readings and translations of couplets 9 and 14 require particular care and are discussed beside those verses.

The transliteration follows the convention used above. The fully vocalized Arabic ending is huwa; in a paused or sung refrain, it is often heard as Hū.

1. The Lord of All Dominion

مَالِكُ الْمُلْكِ لَا شَرِيكَ لَهُ
وَحْدَهُ لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Māliku l-mulki lā sharīka lahu Waḥdahu lā ilāha illā huwa
He is the Lord of all dominion; He has no partner. He alone—there is no god but He.

The opening is Arabic. Waḥdahu means “He alone,” affirming that sovereignty belongs to God without any partner.

2. At the Threshold

عاشقان جان و دل نثار کنند
بر درِ لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
ʿĀsheqān jān va del nesār konand Bar dar-e lā ilāha illā huwa
Lovers offer their hearts and souls at the threshold of “There is no god but He.”

This version reads bar dar-e, “at the door of” or “at the threshold of,” where the version above has bar sar-e. The declaration becomes a threshold at which lovers offer their whole selves.

3. The Robe of Honor

مصطفی یافت در شبِ معراج
خِلعتِ لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Mostafā yāft dar shab-e meʿrāj Khelʿat-e lā ilāha illā huwa
On the night of his Ascension, the Chosen One received the robe of honor: “There is no god but He.”

Muṣṭafā, “the Chosen One,” refers to the Prophet Muḥammad. The declaration is imagined as a robe of honor bestowed upon him. This is the poem’s devotional imagery.

4. Remembrance and Paradise

صوفیان گر بهشت می‌طلبند
ذکرشان لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Sūfiyān gar behesht mī-talaband Zekreshān lā ilāha illā huwa
If the Sufis seek Paradise, their remembrance is “There is no god but He.”

Zekreshān means “their remembrance” or “their devotional invocation.” The verse connects the longing for Paradise with the repeated remembrance of God’s oneness.

5. The Eternal Gardener

باغبانِ قدیمِ لم‌یزلی
صفتش لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Bāghbān-e qadīm-e lam-yazalī Sefatash lā ilāha illā huwa
The Gardener, beginningless and everlasting, is described by these words: “There is no god but He.”

The Gardener is an image of God as the source and sustainer of life. Qadīm means “without beginning”; lam-yazalī expresses everlasting existence.

6. The Collar of the Curse

طوقِ لعنت فگند بر ابلیس
غیرتش لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Towq-e laʿnat fagand bar Eblīs Ghayratash lā ilāha illā huwa
The collar of the curse was cast upon Iblīs by the jealous zeal of “There is no god but He.”

Ghayrat is a fierce protectiveness or jealous zeal. Here I read it as the uncompromising majesty of divine oneness, personified as casting the collar of the curse upon Iblīs. The photographed word is غیرتش, ghayratash.

7. The Believers’ Portion

مؤمنان را نعیم شد روزی
برکتش لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Moʾmenān rā naʿīm shod rūzī Barakatash lā ilāha illā huwa
Bliss has become the believers’ allotted share; its blessing is “There is no god but He.”

Rūzī here means an allotted portion or provision. Naʿīm is bliss or delightful well-being. The compressed second line associates this gift with the blessing of the declaration.

8. The Tree and Its Fruit

خوش درختی‌ست در میانِ جِنان
میوه‌اش لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Khosh derakhtīst dar miyān-e jenān Mīve-ash lā ilāha illā huwa
A lovely tree stands amid the gardens of Paradise; its fruit is “There is no god but He.”

Jenān means “gardens,” here understood as the gardens of Paradise. The declaration appears as a fruit whose sweetness nourishes the one who receives it.

9. Creation and the Divine Command

بستی کاینات كُنْ فَيَكُونُ
از اثرِ لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Bastī kāʾenāt, kun fa-yakūnu Az asar-e lā ilāha illā huwa
You fashioned creation—“Be, and it is”— through the power of “There is no god but He.”

Textual note. The photograph appears to read بستی, bastī, which I provisionally understand as “You fashioned” or “You bound together.” The syntax is compressed, so this translation remains interpretive. I have retained the photographed reading rather than replacing it with هستی, hastī, “existence.” The second line reads از اثر, “through the effect or power of.” Kun fa-yakūn, “Be, and it is,” echoes the divine command in Qurʾān 36:82.

10. Heaven and Earth

آسمان بی‌ستون، زمین بر هوا
قدرتش لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Āsemān bī-sotūn, zamīn bar havā Qodratash lā ilāha illā huwa
Heaven without pillars; earth suspended in air— the power of “There is no god but He.”

The first image recalls the heavens raised without visible pillars in Qurʾān 13:2. “Earth suspended in air” preserves the poem’s imagery. Both images direct the listener’s attention to the divine power that sustains creation.

11. A Call to the Reciter

قاریا! شاد باش، کن حاصل
هنرِ لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Qāriyā! Shād bāsh, kon hāsel Honar-e lā ilāha illā huwa
O reciter, rejoice; acquire the art of “There is no god but He.”

Qāriyā means “O reciter.” Honar can mean art, skill, virtue, or attainment. Here I understand it as learning to recite and inwardly realize the declaration. The printed address is قاریا, not قادرا (“O Powerful One”).

12. The Kohl of Ṣiddīq’s Eye

چشمِ صدیق را مُکَحَّل کرد
سرمهٔ لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Cheshm-e Seddīq rā mokahhal kard Sorme-ye lā ilāha illā huwa
The eye of Ṣiddīq was anointed with the kohl of “There is no god but He.”

Ṣiddīq refers here to Abū Bakr. Mokaḥḥal kard means “applied kohl to” or “anointed with kohl.” I understand the eye as an image of inward sight, clarified by the recognition of divine oneness.

13. The Strength of Fārūq’s Justice

عدلِ فاروق را مدد بخشید
همّتِ لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
ʿAdl-e Fārūq rā madad bakhshīd Hemmat-e lā ilāha illā huwa
The justice of Fārūq was strengthened by the spiritual resolve of “There is no god but He.”

Fārūq refers here to ʿUmar. Hemmat suggests aspiration, resolve, and concentrated spiritual purpose. The poem personifies the declaration as a force supporting his justice.

14. The Forbearance of Dhū al-Nūrayn

کامل‌الحلم گشت ذوالنورین
او همین لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Kāmel al-helm gasht Zu n-Nūrayn Ū hamīn lā ilāha illā huwa
Dhū al-Nūrayn became complete in forbearance; his word was this alone: “There is no god but He.”

Dhū al-Nūrayn, “the possessor of the two lights,” refers to ʿUthmān. Ḥilm means forbearance, patience, and self-restraint. Textual note: I read the photographed second line as او همین, ū hamīn, literally “he—this very [declaration].” “His word was this alone” supplies a link implied by the elliptical wording.

15. The Cry of the Lion of God

دم‌به‌دم بر زبانِ شیرِ خدا
نعرهٔ لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Dam be dam bar zabān-e Shīr-e Khodā Naʿre-ye lā ilāha illā huwa
With every breath, upon the tongue of the Lion of God, the cry: “There is no god but He.”

The Lion of God is ʿAlī. Dam be dam means “at every moment” or “with every breath”; naʿra is a powerful cry. This completes the sequence of verses honoring Abū Bakr, ʿUmar, ʿUthmān, and ʿAlī.

16. The Meaning Known to the Messenger

کس نداند بجز رسولِ کریم
معنیِ لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Kas nadānad be-joz Rasūl-e Karīm Maʿnī-ye lā ilāha illā huwa
None but the noble Messenger knows the meaning of “There is no god but He.”

The literal wording is emphatic. I understand it as praise of the Prophet’s unsurpassed realization of the declaration’s meaning; this explanation is an interpretation of the devotional verse.

17. Seeking God

شمسِ تبریز، گر خدا طلبی
خوش بخوان لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا هُوَ
Shams-e Tabrīz, gar Khodā talabī Khosh bekhān lā ilāha illā huwa
O Shams of Tabriz, if you seek God, chant beautifully: “There is no god but He.”

This version has gar, the shortened form of agar, “if.” The closing addresses Shams of Tabriz directly. His name in the final verse, and the attribution in the printed heading, do not by themselves establish who composed the poem.

Saturday, June 27, 2026

The Door of Longing


بِسْمِ اللّهِ الرَّحْمـَنِ الرَّحِيمِ

خیالِ رویِ تو در هر طریق همرهِ ماست
نسیمِ مویِ تو، پیوندِ جانِ آگهِ ماست

به رَغمِ مدّعیانی که منعِ عشق کنند
جمالِ چهرهٔ تو، حجّتِ موجّهِ ماست

ببین که سیبِ زنخدانِ تو چه می‌گوید
هزار یوسفِ مصری، فتاده در چَهِ ماست

اگر به زلفِ درازِ تو، دستِ ما نرسد
گناهِ بختِ پریشان و دستِ کوتهِ ماست

به حاجبِ درِ خلوت‌سرایِ خاص بگو
فُلان ز گوشه‌نشینانِ خاکِ درگهِ ماست

به صورت از نظر ما اگر چه محجوب است
همیشه در نظرِ خاطرِ مرفّهِ ماست

اگر به سالی حافظ دری زَنَد، بگشای
که سال‌هاست که مشتاقِ رویِ چون مهِ ماست

Meaning:

The image of your face walks with us on every path.

The breeze of your hair is the bond of our awakened soul.

Even if claimants forbid love,

the beauty of your face is our rightful proof.

See what the apple of your chin says:

a thousand Josephs of Egypt have fallen into our well.

If our hand cannot reach your long tress,

the fault is our scattered fortune and our short reach.

Tell the chamberlain at the door of the private chamber:

so-and-so is one of those sitting in the dust of our threshold.

Though outwardly he is hidden from our sight,

he is always present in the sight of our gracious heart.

If Hafez knocks at a door even once in a year, open it,

for he has long been longing for our moon-like face.

Language:

Persian / Farsi

Transliteration:

Khayāl-e rūy-e to dar har tarīq hamrah-e māst
Nasīm-e mūy-e to, peyvand-e jān-e āgah-e māst

Be raghm-e modda‘iyānī ke man‘-e ‘eshq konand
Jamāl-e chehreh-ye to, hojjat-e movajjah-e māst

Bebīn ke sīb-e zanakhdān-e to che mīgūyad
Hezār Yūsof-e Meṣrī, fotādeh dar chah-e māst

Agar be zolf-e derāz-e to dast-e mā naresad
Gonāh-e bakht-e parishān o dast-e kūteh-e māst

Be hājeb-e dar-e khalvat-sarāy-e khāṣṣ begū
Folān ze gūsheh-neshīnān-e khāk-e dargah-e māst

Be sūrat az nazar-e mā agar che mahjūb ast
Hamīsheh dar nazar-e khāter-e moraffah-e māst

Agar be sālī Hāfez darī zanad, bogshāy
Ke sāl-hāst ke moshtāq-e rūy-e chūn mah-e māst

Origins:

These lines are from Hafez, Ghazal number 23. Ganjoor presents the ghazal under Hafez’s Ghazaliyat, gives it as seven couplets, and lists its metre as مفاعلن فعلاتن مفاعلن فعلن. (Ganjoor)

Brief Explanation:

This ghazal is about longing.

But it is not a weak longing.

It is a longing that has memory, proof, humility, and patience.

Hafez begins with the face of the beloved:

خیالِ رویِ تو در هر طریق همرهِ ماست

The beloved may not be outwardly present, but the image of the beloved’s face is present on every path.

That matters.

There is an absence that leaves the heart empty.

But there is also an absence that makes the inner eye more awake.

Hafez is speaking of that second kind. The beloved is not simply remembered as a past event. The beloved is walking with him. The image has become a companion.

In education, in worship, in friendship, and in the moral life, this is important. What we carry inwardly shapes the road outwardly. A child who carries fear sees one kind of world. A child who carries trust sees another. A teacher who carries resentment enters the classroom in one way. A teacher who carries reverence enters in another.

The inner image walks with us.

Then Hafez says:

نسیمِ مویِ تو، پیوندِ جانِ آگهِ ماست

The breeze of the beloved’s hair is the bond of the awakened soul.

This is a beautiful phrase: جانِ آگه — the aware soul.

Love, for Hafez, is not only emotion. It is awareness. It wakes something. It joins the soul to something finer than habit, noise, and self-importance.

That is why the next couplet turns toward the people who forbid love:

به رَغمِ مدّعیانی که منعِ عشق کنند
جمالِ چهرهٔ تو، حجّتِ موجّهِ ماست

There are always مدّعیان — claimants.

People who claim seriousness but have little tenderness.

People who claim religion but fear beauty.

People who claim wisdom but have never been softened by love.

They forbid love because love cannot be fully controlled. It breaks the pride of the self. It makes the clever person humble. It makes the rigid person tremble. It makes the one who thought he knew himself discover that the heart has deeper rooms.

Hafez answers them with one clean argument:

Beauty itself is the proof.

Not noise.

Not argument.

Not display.

Beauty.

The beloved’s face becomes حجّتِ موجّه — a rightful proof, a valid argument.

This is very close to the work of education. A child does not love goodness merely because goodness is commanded. The child must also see its beauty. Truth must have a face. Mercy must have a tone. Discipline must have dignity. Cleanliness must be visible. Reverence must be felt in the room.

Beauty becomes proof.

Then Hafez gives one of the most striking images:

ببین که سیبِ زنخدانِ تو چه می‌گوید
هزار یوسفِ مصری، فتاده در چَهِ ماست

The beloved’s chin is like an apple.

But the dimple of the chin is also like a well.

So Hafez brings Yusuf into the image. Yusuf, known for beauty, was cast into a well. Here, a thousand Egyptian Josephs have fallen into the well of the beloved’s chin.

This is not merely exaggeration. It is Hafez’s way of saying that the usual measures have failed.

When beauty becomes too great, comparison breaks.

Even Yusuf is no longer enough.

This is the nature of real beauty. It makes our ordinary measures feel small. A truly noble act can do this. A sincere apology can do this. A quiet sacrifice can do this. A teacher protecting a weak child can do this. A person forgiving when he had the power to humiliate can do this.

We suddenly see that goodness is deeper than our usual language.

The next couplet is full of humility:

اگر به زلفِ درازِ تو، دستِ ما نرسد
گناهِ بختِ پریشان و دستِ کوتهِ ماست

If our hand cannot reach your long hair, the fault is ours.

Our fortune is scattered.

Our hand is short.

Hafez does not blame the beloved.

This is important.

There is a kind of longing that becomes accusation. It says: because I cannot reach, the beloved must be cruel. Because I cannot possess, the world must be unfair. Because I am not admitted, the door must be wrong.

Hafez does not speak like that here.

He says: my hand is short.

There is moral beauty in this.

A person who can see his own limitation is already closer to wisdom. The child who says, “I was wrong,” has opened a door. The adult who says, “My anger was too much,” has opened a door. The teacher who says, “My expectation was right, but my tone was not clean,” has opened a door.

A short hand can become longer through humility.

But a proud hand remains short, even when it reaches far.

Then the ghazal moves to the door:

به حاجبِ درِ خلوت‌سرایِ خاص بگو
فُلان ز گوشه‌نشینانِ خاکِ درگهِ ماست

There is a private chamber.

There is a door.

There is a chamberlain.

And there is someone sitting in the dust of the threshold.

This is the image of waiting.

Not every door opens quickly.

Not every longing is answered at once.

Not every prayer is given its visible fruit immediately.

The lover is not inside. He is at the threshold. He does not announce himself with pride. He says فُلان — so-and-so. As if his name is not the important thing. His position is the important thing.

He is one of those who sit in the dust.

This dust matters.

In Persian poetry, the dust of the beloved’s door is not humiliation in the ugly sense. It is the place where pride is lowered. It is where the self stops demanding to be central. It is where waiting becomes part of purification.

A school also has thresholds.

A child may stand at the threshold of reading for a long time.

Another at the threshold of truthfulness.

Another at the threshold of self-control.

Another at the threshold of prayer.

Another at the threshold of trust.

We should not despise the one who is still at the door.

Some souls are not far because they are careless. Some are near because they are waiting with sincerity.

Then comes the tender answer:

به صورت از نظر ما اگر چه محجوب است
همیشه در نظرِ خاطرِ مرفّهِ ماست

Outwardly, he is hidden from sight.

Inwardly, he is remembered.

This is one of the gentlest meanings in the ghazal.

There is the sight of the eye.

And there is the sight of the heart.

The eye may not see the one at the door, but the heart has not forgotten him.

This gives comfort.

Many good efforts are hidden. A child may be trying inwardly while outwardly still failing. A teacher may be carrying a concern no one praises. A parent may be making quiet sacrifices that are never noticed. A student may be fighting a private battle to become better.

Outwardly, much is hidden.

But not everything hidden is lost.

The final couplet brings Hafez himself into the poem:

اگر به سالی حافظ دری زَنَد، بگشای
که سال‌هاست که مشتاقِ رویِ چون مهِ ماست

If Hafez knocks even once in a year, open the door.

Why?

Because he has been longing for years.

This is a beautiful balance.

The knock may be rare.

But the longing is old.

That matters for how we look at people.

Sometimes a person shows only one small sign of return. One question. One apology. One moment of softness. One attempt after many failures. One knock after a long silence.

A harsh person may ignore it.

A wise person opens.

Not because the knock is loud.

Because the longing behind it may be deep.

This is important in homes and schools. A child who has resisted for months may one day show one small opening. If the adult is proud, he may say, “Now you come?” But if the adult has a generous heart, he opens the door.

Some doors should not be guarded by ego.

They should be opened by mercy.

A note about the wording:

The repeated ending ماست gives the ghazal its music.

It can mean “is ours.”

It can also mean “is with us.”

This repetition gathers the poem around belonging.

The image of your face is with us.

The breeze of your hair is our bond.

Your beauty is our proof.

The well of your chin is ours.

The fault is ours.

The threshold is ours.

The gracious remembrance is ours.

The moon-like face is ours.

But the “we” is not simple. Sometimes it feels like the lover speaking. Sometimes it feels like the beloved’s royal voice. This movement is part of the beauty of the poem. The lover seeks the beloved, but the beloved’s presence has already entered his speech.

The distance remains.

But so does nearness.

Moral Use:

These lines are useful when we think about longing, patience, and the way we respond to small signs of return.

Before closing a door.

Before judging a person who is still outside.

Before dismissing a child who has only begun to try.

Before saying, “It is too late.”

Before refusing a small knock.

They ask:

What image walks with me?

Do I carry beauty inwardly, or only complaint?

Do I allow beauty to become proof?

Do I blame others too quickly for what my own short hand cannot reach?

Can I sit at the threshold without losing dignity?

Can I notice the one who is outwardly hidden but inwardly sincere?

Can I open the door when the knock finally comes?

Hafez teaches us that longing has manners.

It remembers.

It waits.

It does not make loud claims.

It sits in the dust.

It knocks rarely, but sincerely.

And when such a longing comes to the door, the door should not remain closed.

When Everything Comes from the Friend

بِسْمِ اللّهِ الرَّحْمـَنِ الرَّحِيمِ

مَگَر صَبا زِ سَرِ کُویِ دُوسْت می‌آیَد
کِه اَز زَمین و زَمان بُویِ دُوسْت می‌آیَد

چِه رَشْک‌هاست کِه اَز باد می‌بَرَم هَر شَب
کِه رُویِ او زِ چِه بَر رُویِ دُوسْت می‌آیَد

زِ کُویِ دُوسْت چو عاشِق کَشیده دار پای
کَمَنْدِ شَوْق هَم اَز مُویِ دُوسْت می‌آیَد

وَفا چِگونه کُنَد عَقْل و هُوش با مَنِ مَسْت
چُنین کِه جام پَیاپَی زِ دُوسْت می‌آیَد

هَر آن‌چِه آیَدَت اَز غَیْب، نیک و بَد مَنِگَر
هَمین بَس اَست کِه اَز سُویِ دُوسْت می‌آیَد

اَز این مَصائِبِ دَوْران مَنال و شادان باش
کِه تیرِ دُوسْت بِه پَهْلُویِ دُوسْت می‌آیَد

بِیا و وَعْظِ مُعین، رُموزِ عِشْق شِنَو
کِه اَز حِکایَتِ او بُویِ دُوسْت می‌آیَد

Meaning:

Can it be the dawn breeze coming from the lane of the Friend?

For from earth and time itself, the fragrance of the Friend is coming.

What jealousies I suffer from the wind each night,

for how does its face come face to face with the Friend?

Lover, try to hold your foot back from the Friend’s lane,

yet the noose of longing itself comes from the Friend’s hair.

How can reason and awareness remain faithful to me, drunk as I am,

when cup after cup keeps coming from the Friend?

Whatever comes to you from the Unseen, do not look at it as good or bad.

This is enough: it comes from the side of the Friend.

Do not complain of these afflictions of the turning age; be joyful.

The arrow of the Friend comes to the side of the Friend’s own lover.

Come and listen to Muʿīn’s counsel; hear the mysteries of love,

for from his telling comes the fragrance of the Friend.

Language:

Persian

Transliteration:

Magar ṣabā ze sar-e kūy-e dūst mī-āyad
Ke az zamīn o zamān būy-e dūst mī-āyad

Che rashk-hāst ke az bād mī-baram har shab
Ke rūy-e ū ze che bar rūy-e dūst mī-āyad

Ze kūy-e dūst cho ʿāsheq keshīde dār pāy
Kamand-e shawq ham az mūy-e dūst mī-āyad

Vafā chegūne konad ʿaql o hūsh bā man-e mast
Chonīn ke jām payāpay ze dūst mī-āyad

Har ān-che āyadat az ghayb, nīk o bad ma-negar
Hamīn bas ast ke az sūy-e dūst mī-āyad

Az īn maṣāʾeb-e dowrān manāl o shādān bāsh
Ke tīr-e dūst be pahlūy-e dūst mī-āyad

Biyā o vaʿẓ-e Muʿīn, romūz-e ʿeshq shenow
Ke az ḥekāyat-e ū būy-e dūst mī-āyad

Origins:

These lines are from a Persian ghazal associated with Muʿīn / Muʿīnī. In South Asian circulation, poems of this dīvān have often appeared under the name of Khwāja Muʿīn al-Dīn Chishtī, but modern scholarship treats the dīvān as belonging to Farāhī Heravī, whose poetic names include Muʿīn, Muʿīnī, and Miskīn. A stylistic study of Farāhī Heravī’s poems notes the simplicity and naturalness of his language, and places his poetry within a deeply mystical current.

The same study quotes the central couplet:

هَرآنچه آیدت از غیب نیک و بد منگر

همین بس است که از سوی دوست می‌آید

and places it under the poet’s mystical view of destiny and trust in the Divine order.

Brief Explanation:

This ghazal is built on one returning movement:

می‌آیَد — it comes.

The breeze comes.

The fragrance comes.

The cup comes.

The arrow comes.

The story comes.

Everything is arriving.

But the poem is not mainly about arrival from the outside. It is about learning to recognize the Sender.

That is the heart of the poem.

The poet does not say that life will always come gently. He does not say that every event will feel sweet. He does not deny pain, confusion, jealousy, longing, or affliction.

He says something deeper.

Look at where it comes from.

The first image is the morning breeze:

صَبا

In Persian poetry, ṣabā is not only wind. It is a messenger. It carries news. It carries scent. It passes where the lover cannot pass. It enters the lane of the Beloved and returns with a fragrance.

This is why the poet says:

اَز زَمین و زَمان بُویِ دُوسْت می‌آیَد

From earth and time comes the fragrance of the Friend.

This is a beautiful way of seeing the world.

The earth is not empty.

Time is not empty.

Events are not merely events.

There is scent in them.

There is a trace.

There is a hidden kindness, even when the surface is difficult.

The lover then becomes jealous of the wind.

That may sound strange at first.

Why be jealous of wind?

Because the wind has access.

The wind reaches the Friend’s face. The lover remains distant. The wind touches what the lover longs for. In ordinary love, this is jealousy. In mystical love, it is also a lesson.

Everything is closer to the Friend than the ego thinks.

The breeze, the dust, the night, the wound, the cup, the arrow — all are under His command.

Then comes the couplet of being unable to leave:

زِ کُویِ دُوسْت چو عاشِق کَشیده دار پای
کَمَنْدِ شَوْق هَم اَز مُویِ دُوسْت می‌آیَد

The lover is told to hold back his foot from the lane of the Friend.

But how can he?

The lasso of longing comes from the Friend’s own hair.

This is one of the tender truths of the path.

The seeker thinks, “I am seeking.”

But the poem says:

Your seeking was already a rope thrown by the Friend.

Your longing was not born only in you.

It came to you.

Your restlessness is also a gift.

Your hunger for truth is also a sign.

Your inability to be satisfied with a small life is also a mercy.

Then the poem turns to intoxication:

وَفا چِگونه کُنَد عَقْل و هُوش با مَنِ مَسْت
چُنین کِه جام پَیاپَی زِ دُوسْت می‌آیَد

Reason and awareness cannot remain steady with a drunk lover when cup after cup is coming from the Friend.

This is not the drunkenness of heedlessness.

It is the bewilderment of love.

There is a kind of sobriety that is useful. We need judgment. We need balance. We need duty. We need discipline.

But there is also a point where the heart receives more than the mind can arrange.

A child feels this before an adult often does.

A child can stand before the sea, a tree, a bird, a flame, a night sky, and become silent.

The mind has not disappeared.

It has bowed.

That is a holy bowing.

Education should not kill this.

A school that teaches only information but does not protect wonder has taken the cup away from the child.

Then comes the central teaching:

هَر آن‌چِه آیَدَت اَز غَیْب، نیک و بَد مَنِگَر
هَمین بَس اَست کِه اَز سُویِ دُوسْت می‌آیَد

Whatever comes from the Unseen, do not look at it as good or bad.

This does not mean that cruelty becomes good.

It does not mean that injustice should be accepted.

It does not mean that a person should stop working, stop resisting wrong, or stop protecting the weak.

It means that beneath the changing surface of life, the lover keeps trust with the Friend.

There is a difference between moral judgment and inward complaint.

We must still call truth truth.

We must still call harm harm.

We must still serve, repair, protect, and act.

But inwardly, the heart learns not to become bitter toward the One who sends the lesson.

That is very difficult.

It is also very freeing.

The poem does not ask the lover to understand everything.

It asks the lover to trust the Sender.

This matters deeply in education.

A teacher also receives many things from the unseen part of a child’s life.

A child may come with anger.

A child may come with fear.

A child may come with silence.

A child may come with restlessness.

A child may come with defiance.

A child may come with grief that has no words.

The teacher’s first task is not to label too quickly.

Good child.

Bad child.

Easy child.

Difficult child.

Bright child.

Weak child.

These judgments are often too small.

The poem says:

نیک و بَد مَنِگَر

Do not look only through the narrow window of good and bad.

Look deeper.

What is being sent to me through this child?

What is being asked of me?

Patience?

Firmness?

Mercy?

Clear speech?

A higher gaze?

A cleaner intention?

Sometimes the difficult child is a cup from the Friend.

Sometimes the interruption is a cup from the Friend.

Sometimes the delay is a cup from the Friend.

Sometimes the wound that humbles the teacher is a cup from the Friend.

This does not make the work easy.

It makes it sacred.

Then the poem speaks of afflictions:

اَز این مَصائِبِ دَوْران مَنال و شادان باش
کِه تیرِ دُوسْت بِه پَهْلُویِ دُوسْت می‌آیَد

Do not complain of the troubles of the age.

Be joyful.

The arrow of the Friend comes to the side of the Friend’s own lover.

This is not a small statement.

An arrow hurts.

The poet does not deny that.

But in the language of love, even the wound can become nearness.

There are wounds that make a person hard.

There are wounds that make a person bitter.

There are wounds that close the heart.

But there are also wounds that open the heart.

A disappointment can remove pride.

A loss can teach dependence on God.

A delay can purify intention.

A failure can return a person to prayer.

A hardship can make the soul softer toward the pain of others.

The arrow is still an arrow.

But when it comes from the Friend, it is not meaningless.

This is the difference between despair and surrender.

Despair says:

This pain is empty.

Surrender says:

I do not understand this pain, but I will not let it separate me from the Friend.

That is spiritual maturity.

The final couplet returns to fragrance:

بِیا و وَعْظِ مُعین، رُموزِ عِشْق شِنَو
کِه اَز حِکایَتِ او بُویِ دُوسْت می‌آیَد

Come and listen.

Hear the mysteries of love.

From this telling comes the scent of the Friend.

The poem began with the breeze carrying fragrance.

It ends with the poet’s own speech carrying fragrance.

That is what true poetry does.

It becomes ṣabā.

It does not merely explain.

It carries scent.

It brings the heart near.

A note about the wording:

The word دُوسْت is central.

It means Friend.

But in Persian mystical poetry, the Friend is not only a human companion. The Friend can be the Beloved, the guide, the hidden Lord, the One who wounds and heals, the One who sends the cup and the arrow.

This is why the word is so powerful.

The poem does not say “God” directly in every line.

It says “Friend.”

That changes the feeling.

“God” may be heard as power.

“Friend” is heard as nearness.

“God” may make the servant stand in awe.

“Friend” makes the lover tremble with intimacy.

Both are needed.

But this ghazal chooses intimacy.

The other important word is غَیْب — the Unseen.

The Unseen is not nothingness.

It is the hidden side of reality.

Many things reach us from there before we understand them.

A meeting.

A loss.

A sentence.

A child’s question.

A sudden ache of longing.

A door closing.

A door opening.

The lover does not understand all of it.

But he learns to ask:

From whom has this come?

That one question changes the heart.

Moral Use:

These lines are useful before complaint.

Before judging an event too quickly.

Before losing patience with a child.

Before becoming proud of ease.

Before becoming bitter in hardship.

Before saying, “Why has this come to me?”

They ask the heart:

Can I see the Friend in what has arrived?

Can I receive the cup without vanity?

Can I receive the arrow without despair?

Can I see longing itself as a rope from the Friend?

Can I stop dividing every moment too quickly into good and bad?

This does not remove responsibility.

It purifies it.

We still act.

We still correct.

We still protect.

We still work.

We still speak truth.

But we do not let the heart become poisoned by complaint.

For a teacher, this poem is a quiet training.

The child who comes before us is not only a task.

The day that comes before us is not only a schedule.

The difficulty that comes before us is not only a disturbance.

Something is being sent.

Something is being taught.

Something is being asked.

The poem gives one sentence to carry:

هَمین بَس اَست کِه اَز سُویِ دُوسْت می‌آیَد

This is enough:

It comes from the Friend.


The Heart Already Known

A Persian couplet in praise of Mīr Sayyid ʿAlī Hamadānī, attributed to Sayyid Jalāl al-Dīn Bukhārī. بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَٰنِ...